Home, you know

Posted on March 10, 2010
Filed Under May I Interject?, Texas, Thought | Leave a Comment

Corpus Christi is the land of sequential epiphanies. You take one look at the ocean and then you remember what’s real. I stayed up the entirety of last night–We listened and discussed hip hop; I revisited skateboarding. At 8 AM we got a huge $1.50 breakfast taco and sat silently on the beach. The sun came out as we were leaving.

At this point I’m unsure of the world’s true reality.

News Penguin!

Posted on March 5, 2010
Filed Under CMU, May I Interject?, Work Cyclical | Leave a Comment

iPhone sexiness: Part ii

Posted on February 24, 2010
Filed Under Coverage, May I Interject?, Thought | Leave a Comment

I had a comment on my last post that challenged my argument. My rebuttal statement, I think, helps elaborate my previous argument:

You are talking about this as if it’s a violation of freedom of information–like Apple is “censoring” these things. I’ll tell you why that’s not true.

In reality this is just a BUSINESS DECISION. Barnes & Noble does not carry pornography because it is a BUSINESS DECISION. Blockbuster does not rent pornography because it is a BUSINESS DECISION. It’s not censorship, it’s merely a choice made that will reflect on the company.You can very well surf the Internet from your phone and find pornography, but this is not pornography distributed by and for Apple products.

You point out the argument about the Swimsuit Illustrated app. This is a mainstream publication. It’s not just an app someone created. Removing the S.I. app would be like removing S.I. from Barnes & Noble or any number of films from Blockbuster that show women in bikinis. Apple is simply making an age-old business decision, and because they are just ONE company, they are NOT the government, they have every right to do that.

As for entertaining this angle– How do you think the New York Times would cover this? You think they would only show the side of the whiny-I-miss-my-boobs-app iPhone owners? There is a place and time for everything. Your employer probably does not let you surf Internet porn at work. Why not get mad at them? The point is that porn never made a good argument for mobility–It’s best kept in one’s own privacy and in a context of solitude.

iPhone sexiness

Posted on February 23, 2010
Filed Under Coverage, May I Interject?, Thought | 3 Comments

Most people know my general take on the topic of pornography…

But let me say, I have faced the fact that I have an average lifespan of 80 years–I know I am not capable of changing anything substantial, nor capable of living a life with the need to be consistently militant about anything because then I’d never be happy.

I’ve been trained as a journalist, and because the discourse about pornography is wide-ranging in sentiment, I understand that my opinion is probably not “right.” I can look at this issue objectively.

Having said that, what has bothered me are the articles that have come out of the tech blogs about Apple removing the “boobie” iPhone apps. To recap, Apple has removed certain “sexy” apps because women and mothers complained they were either objectifying to women or easily at risk to be seen by children.

As predicted, there has been lots of criticism of Apple’s action. That is to be expected, and that’s fine. That’s not what bothers me; the argument is healthy.

What bothers me (and what makes me miss the objectivity/seeing-both-sides aspect of true journalism) is the inability of blogs like Gizmodo and TechCrunch to even acknowledge that preventing objectification might rank higher on the priority list than the availability of porn iPhone apps. It seems like one side has been taken. The only article I have seen that might consider some material might potentially offend someone is this article from Gizmodo, but even then it seems like the author is stepping on her tiptoes so that she doesn’t get too much attention from her male coworkers.

When it comes down to it, what are you arguing for? Don’t you realize that 10 years ago you would have been confused if someone told you that “porn apps on mobile phones would be banned?” Big f’ing deal. Porn is the most prominent thing on the Internet. It’s everywhere.

Wah, I can’t get porn applications on my iPhone. Wah wah wah. No more porn on the bus. Wah. No more porn during lunch break. Wah. These are first-first-first world problems. You are complaining about porn, women are complaining about feeling like objects and a little uncomfortable… What is the bigger underlying social issue here, first-worlders?

Articles about the issue:
Why Apple Banned Sex Apps
Apple, There’s Pornography On My iPhone
Apple Bans Sexy Apps, Developers Upset

On Repeat

Posted on February 12, 2010
Filed Under May I Interject? | Leave a Comment

You’ve come a long way, baby Alan.

BEEtnik Buzz

Posted on February 10, 2010
Filed Under May I Interject? | 1 Comment

Hipster cousin of Google Buzz. Lost two of his arms in the Polli-Nation War of 09.

Survey!

Posted on February 10, 2010
Filed Under CMU, Work Cyclical | Leave a Comment

Dearest blog readers,

Puhhhleeez fill out this survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/ZGGZNXZ. It will indirectly benefit your Internet experience in the future, as it will be used as research for my studio team and I to build a Web app.

Gracias!

-CD